Some people think that you can never become fluent in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country.To what extent do you agree?

There is common thinking among people nowadays pertaining to the fluency of a language being restricted to natives and one must be present among them to get to that level of speech. Well, I am ambivalent to this opinion and in the lines to come, I will explain why.

On one hand, this is an intrinsic property of human being that he adapts to his surroundings; acclimatizing himself to fit in, and learn the means of communication that will help him establish his grounds in that area. Therefore, when people start living in a foreign community, they often pick up the tone, dialect and accent of the locals. Moreover, conversing daily with a multitude of people coming from different professions tend to automatically increase the lexical resource thus making their language flawless and smooth.

On the other hand albeit, people struggling to immigrate ta a foreign country often have to pass the local language exam of that particular country, and in an effort to do so, they often try to imitate locals. Well, in olden days when technology was not advance, people searched for a citizen of that country, residing in their hometown, to converse with him in exchange of a hefty payment. But, in the world today, the advent of the internet and social media has interconnected every distant part of the world; people of various origins now converse with each other daily regarding different topics. This has actually broadened the roadway to the fluency challenge that the people faced previously.

To conclude, in my opinion, the statement related to the fluency pertaining to only locals has no worth anymore and though it is a little uphill to practice the language to a level of local fluency, the internet has made it possible. Therefore, in the end, my vote goes in complete disaccord with the statement.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92833876221 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71576080827 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8108694052 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.545454545 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949005398028 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332120508517 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287505387713 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516926764092 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271022251622 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.