In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks?
People have different views about whether using closed-circuit television is being increased to decrease crime or invading our privacy. While some people think video cameras in public spaces are invasions of privacy, I believe that the benefits outweight the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people may reject using video cameras in public places. Firstly, these cameras might infringe upon our privacy, in the sense that all our actions are recorded and these recordings can be misused because individuals’ pictures are likely to be stolen for bad purposes. In other words, these pictures might be shared on the social networks without our agreements. Secondly, we may always have feeling of being followed and this can lead to feeling more nervous and scared than safe.
Despite the drawbacks mentioned above, I do believe that using surveillance cameras public has positive effects. The CCTV cameras could decrease crime rate and deter criminals before crimes are committed. Offenders could be less likely to perform in some places of cities where they know they are being watched. For example, offenders may always take advantages of people’s weakness in the public spaces to operating criminal acts such as stealing their wallets or other personal property. However, if these places are equipped with video cameras, that can improve public safety and reduce pretty crimes. In addition, when crimes are committed, police officers can base on video evidence to catch and accuse offenders so that surveillance cameras could support police officers make cities more safe for citizens.
In conclusion, I can understand why some people might disapproval public video cameras, but it seems to me that CCTV is much more helpful in our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | maiphuong656594 | 96 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 56
- In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks? 67
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks 96
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks? 78
- In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the benefits outweight the drawbacks. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng more nervous and scared than safe. Despite the drawbacks mentioned above, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s make cities more safe for citizens. In conclusion, I can understand why some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 4.92783505155 284% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 937.175257732 160% => OK
No of words: 281.0 206.0 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33451957295 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60391729006 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 290.88556701 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1059248379 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 76.5299724578 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 4.34317383033 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357896802515 0.216113520407 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122999300249 0.0766984524023 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645078984447 0.0603063233224 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210375175592 0.12726935374 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709098157597 0.0580467560999 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 8.37731958763 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 41.2886597938 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.