The line graph compares the average emission of carbon dioxide (co2) per person in four countries during a period from1967 to 2007. It is measured in metric tonnes.
To begin in 1967, the level of co2 emission in the UK was 12 memtric tonnes, almost equal to the combination of the rest three conutries. The number declined steadily over the next forty years and reached around 9 by the end of the period, however, it still ranked the most in the graph.
On the contrary, Italy and Portugal showed a growing trend, approximately 4 and 1 repectively in the begining. There was a dramatic rise in italy emission in the first decade and the number outtook Sweden in late 1980s. After reaching its highest point just below 8, Italy levelled off. Portugal had the least emission of carbon dioxide, however, the figure increased stably over the period given and ended at above 5 in 2007.
Different from the others, Sweden`s emission firstly grew from around 9 in 1967 to a peak of above 10 in the following decade. After that, Sweden witnessed a sharp fall until 2007 when it met the same emission with protugal.
Overall, despite the declining of emission, the UK remained the highest level of the four.
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 78
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7990430622 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56778705657 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617224880383 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1170804076 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246981851141 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870290032292 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724657455351 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121150072646 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852866336817 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.