It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Recently, the preservation of the old buildings has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should we preserve the old buildings, even it is costy?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the preservation of the beautiful buildings is not very important, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the culural standpoint, historical background is bound up inextricably with tradition, which indicates it leads to both old building and folklore. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between heritage history and cultural value as well as an exponential increase in tourisim industry. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of economic values is correlated positively with not only preservation but also financial support.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, government investment attribute to making money, in that it would come down to growing travelling industry, foreigners, and tourists. A salient example of such attribution is museum, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take old-fashioned story for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint culural ignorance problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to expensive project, committent workers, and even profit. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government and private sectors.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that we should preserve the old buildings, even it is costy. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Gohar Khan | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Bhawati | 80 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 77
- what roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- As people become increasingly more dependent on motor cars, the public transport systems tend to run down. This has serious consequences for both existing community and new communities, which are spreading farther and farther from town centers. Express yo 80
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76551724138 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19196374984 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8901890147 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121973319279 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368502175866 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402058132877 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724984476835 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443960315515 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.