Some companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think that it is good, while others think that there are disadvantages. Dicuss both views and give your opinion.
It is debatable fact that in order to promote their products, companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some masses feel that it is an effective way, whereas others think that there are some drawbacks. This essay intends to discuss both views. I however, gravitate towards former view.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why it is appropriate way for companies to enhance their productivity with the help of sport. The mammoth recognisable fact is that if companies sponsor sport as advertise, it assists to promote different types of products as it is such a way to advertise, which helps the company to promote product not only in one country, even rest of the world. In addition, since sport is a crucial part of the world, it encourages the people to attract towards the products. A long-term contact is done by some companies with which could be improved infrastructure of sports by sponsor money. To illustrate, vivo cell phone company which always promotes ipl games in india that is best advertise way to promote products by sport.
However, this kind of advertise has some demerits. Firstly, in order to earn as much money, sport player promote some bad products ranging from cigarette and alcohol which more likely to prove worse for the society. Moreover, it is due to the bad companies which spend lots of money on single player instead of whole team as match fixing, resulting the quality of game could be damaged by it. Apart from this, some people get bored from such products which are promoted again and again. Thus, government needs to take action against such companies which could be worst for the society and games in the future.
To sum up, albeit sport field a much better approach to promote products for companies, owing to the some fake companies which are promoting bad things, should be banned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Veet ganger | 73 | view |
- It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museum open to the public. What do you think is the best way of finding them, example the government, business or individual. 56
- In Many countries, mainly tourists but not local people, visit museum and historical sites. Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places. 73
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. Other think that money should be spent on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment. 67
- Some companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think that it is good, while others think that there are disadvantages. Dicuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is debatable fact that in order to promote their prod...
^^
Line 13, column 102, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...te products for companies, owing to the some fake companies which are promoting bad ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, apart from, in addition, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90851735016 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51438358444 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539432176656 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7148568083 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263541163641 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101206811127 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709724685617 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186010468689 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108864378527 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.