A lot of high school students now cheat in homework assignments, by asking other students for answers. Which of the following do you think is the most efficient way to stop?
-asking parents to help stop the students from cheating
-penalty or punishment to the students
-asking teacher to create homework assignment that cannot be easily cheated
Some people think that the most efficient and effective way to stop cheating in homework assignment is parents’ help to stop the students from cheating or penalty, while others think that homework assignment which is difficult to cheat can hinder cheating. If forced to choose one over others, my resolute standpoint is in line with giving creative assignment which is not easy to copy other students’ answer. There are several reasons as follows.
First of all, if homework assignment is difficult to cheat, there is no need to ask other students for answers. To be specific, writing an essay rather than multiple choice type questions is likely to copy other students’ answer because there is no answer for writing their thought. For example, I want to compare two cases of myself and my sister. We went to different schools which had different approach on cheating. First, I will explain the school I enrolled in. To stop cheating on homework assignment, teachers made open questions which do not have exact answers so that students had to state their own reasoning for the homework, which made copying other students’ answer meaningless. Furthermore, this led to higher enthusiasm which also worked as a driving force for them to put more effort into their tasks. Through trials and errors, students can have a deep understanding of their studies. On the contrary, my sister’s school asked their student’s parents help to stop them from cheating and they announced that students who cheated their homework would be kicked out. However, the school overlooked the fact that most high school students are in adolescent age; thus, parent’s suggestion might be regarded as an intervention. Also, punishment was effective only in the case that school found the student who cheated, otherwise, lots of students kept cheating their homework. This experience taught me that students need more creative and open questions rather than punishment or parent’s advice.
All things considered, I strongly believe that the advantages of making open type questions far outweigh those of penalty or parent’s help to prevent cheating for the reasons I have mentioned in the above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | akshaymanjunath | 60 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | jojoyo | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | haoboooo | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Nguyen Doan | 76 | view |
- bicycle 50
- university 75
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 63
- What would you change to improve your health?1. Food quality2. The amount of exercise in your life3. The amount of stress in your life 76
- The author argues that governments should address current issues in advance rather than future problems. While it is plausible in some cases, it may not always be the case. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'choosing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: choosing
...to cheat can hinder cheating. If forced to choose one over others, my resolute standpoint...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89212777834 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548295454545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2324574787 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467174849535 0.236089414692 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146498972333 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126619224228 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289106017476 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131432505343 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.