Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecturer discusses producing ethanol from plants and using it intead of gasolin as a feul. The author states that replacing gasolin is not a good solution by giving three reasons. That being said, the lecturerprovides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that consuming ethanol can not reduce the amount of carbon dioxide since by burning ethanol, it produces the gas an leads to global warming. However, the lecturer explains that in order to produce ethanol, people need to plant corns. Corns consum carbon dioxide in the process of growing up so every growing seed encounters the released carbon dioxide as a consequence of burning ethanol.
Second, the writer proclaims that producing ethanol in this way results in plant depletion for other uses. For example the writer point out that a part of the corn is grown for animals to eat. Yet again, the speaker underscores that idea. He mentions, ethanol is made of chemical called cellulos. This chemical can be found in parts of the plant which is not eatable so the parts that can be eaten is used for animals and the part which is not usable for this goal is used to produce ethanol. So we can feed animal as well as producing the gas using available parts.
The final point of contention between reading and listening passages is the price. The author thinks that ethanol can not compete with gasolin since gasolin is a lot cheaper. On the onther hand, the speaker explains that there exist a relationship between the amount of production and the price of the product. He thinks that ethonal will be able to catch up with gasolin even without government help. For now goverments pay a subsidy to encourage people to grow more corn and produce more ethanol in this way but the more the production the lesses the price. He gives an statstic about an anticipation that if farmers produce three times the ethonol the price will dorp by fourty percent.
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 3
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task 42
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 76
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 3
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...by burning ethanol, it produces the gas an leads to global warming. However, the l...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an lead' or simply 'leads'?
Suggestion: an lead; leads
...by burning ethanol, it produces the gas an leads to global warming. However, the lecture...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...oduction the lesses the price. He gives an statstic about an anticipation that if ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81104651163 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45172254045 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497093023256 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4971039964 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9444444444 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454498039258 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132021849466 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757147800697 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26587171702 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286215220768 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.