Proper communication is the most important aspect of any group activity. That being said I personally believe that interacting with your project partners in person is far more superior than communicating with them over e-mail. I will elaborate on this by exploring two reasons in the following essay.
Firstly, there's less chance of misinterpretation and vagueness when talking to your partners in person. Talking directly to each other allows for a more interactive and back and forth conversation there and then. If any questions or misunderstandings come up, they can be discussed in the moment and a clear understanding of what being said can be reached by everyone. As an example i can mention a personal experience of mine when i was getting my master of science degree. Me and a friend had to work on a relatively long research which required high levels of coordination. First we had to write a plan book of what we were supposed to do and we wrote the book most of the times while being together in the library. This allowed us to discuss our ideas continuously, answering any questions that any of us might have had there and then and we ended up writing a detailed and clear text of what were supposed to do for the research.
Secondly, Communicating with your partners in person will eventually lead to deeper friendships. Since interacting with your project mates in person requires you to at least see each other, it could end up helping you being better friends in the end. for instance, I had a lab partner that I communicated with often about work and this required us to go out together and see each other on a regular basis. At the end of the lab course for what we've been through together me and her ended up being really close friends.
In Conclusion i think interacting in person with your work partners is far more beneficial because one, it will allow for clear back and worth conversations and lowers the chance of misunderstandings and two it may help you forge deep friendships.
- TPO 55 Writing IntegratedBecause of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. 3
- TPO 52- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars 85
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being repla 73
- TPO 55 Writing IntegratedBecause of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
... your project partners in person is far more superior than communicating with them over e-mail. I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ons in the following essay. Firstly, theres less chance of misinterpretation and va...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: IN_THE_MOMENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at the moment' (=currently)?
Suggestion: at the moment
...tandings come up, they can be discussed in the moment and a clear understanding of what being...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... being said can be reached by everyone. As an example i can mention a personal exp...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n be reached by everyone. As an example i can mention a personal experience of mi...
^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tion a personal experience of mine when i was getting my master of science degree...
^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...each other, it could end up helping you being better friends in the end. for instance...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ng you being better friends in the end. for instance, I had a lab partner that I co...
^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
.... At the end of the lab course for what weve been through together me and her ended ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... really close friends. In Conclusion i think interacting in person with your w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, at least, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76285714286 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94430061686 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5883272336 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187293164903 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639497434752 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421925285216 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12147919681 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374779858435 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.