Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecturer discusses decline in yellow cedar population. The author states that the number of these trees are gowing down with a constant pace since a hundered years ago. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that these trees are dying as a result of insects parasite. The larvae of the beetle consumes the wood which leads to destruction of the tree. However, the lecturer explains that these insects can not be the cause the trees are resistant to such attacks. The yellow cedar trees are sancturated with a chemical protecting it from insects since the chemical is poisoness for insects. So they it is unlikely that these insects be the reason of the trees annihiliation. He mentiones that some trees were found dead with the insects corpses around it. He claims that the insects may have attacked an already damaged tree and the insects themselves are not responsible for the death of the tree.
Second, the writer proclaims that the bears might be the cause. The bark of the cedar trees contain high amount of sugar which the bear can use. Yet again the speaker underscores that claim. He points out the bears might be the reason for a part of the destruction but not for all. The authour mentions that the cedar trees are spread widely around the continent but bears are not found every where and they are limited to some places. He gives an instance to illustrate his point. Cedar trees can be found on the islands. Albeit there live no bears but still the cedar trees are dying out so the peaker challenges this idea by mentioning that the trees are declining with and without bears.
The final point of contention between reading and listening passages is climate changes. The author thinks gorwing roots of these trees might be influenced by the changes in the temreture and the will freez as a consequence of this enviromental effect. On the othere hand, the speaker explains that frost may damage roots of most plants but this kind of tree is really resistant to the cold whether. The lecturer supports his claim by pointing the fact that fewer trees are dying in cold vicinities while in warmer quarters we observe more losses. Although roots are sensitive but this can not be the reason.
- TPO 36 integrated writing 52
- working four days a week 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 76
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...al is poisoness for insects. So they it is unlikely that these insects be the reas...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er underscores that claim. He points out the bears might be the reason for a part...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...d the continent but bears are not found every where and they are limited to some places. He...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, really, second, so, still, well, while, as to, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 404.0 270.72406181 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77722772277 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36006771422 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1985658734 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9130434783 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397911960636 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117423033995 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687100103182 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233631825967 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502400196477 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.