Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time jobs and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Dicuss both views and give your opinion.
There is no doubt that job is essential part of life. Most people reckon teenagers need to work in part-time jobs, clamours are heard that there kind of jobs could be worst for the teenagers. This easy intends to discuss both views. I however, gravitate towards former view.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why part-time jobs play a vital role in their life. The mammoth recognisable fact is that if youngsters work in part-time job to manage their expense, it will assist them to become a responsible and independent individual. Even it teaches the teenagers how to manage the money in the life. Since understanding the value of money is important, it assists them how they can spend earning money as per their needs. In addition, as per middle class masses who are not able to afford tuition fees, while such part-time jobs in which teenagers can work and manage their fees structure. To illustrate, according to a recent survey which carried out in America, there are about 70% youngsters who work in part-time job and cope their daily expense instead of depend on parent's income.
However, there are some factors which could be horrible for the teenagers. Working students may not be able to devote time for study. Owing to the much work, they cannot manage balance among academic and work, resulting failure in the exam. The another reason is linked to the greed as make money. It is due to that students run towards to make money. Youngsters could be distracted from path of study by it. Moreover, on account of hectic daily schedule, some ones more likely to come under a deep pressure. Thus making a good balance between study and job will be beneficial for the teenagers.
To sum up, albeit part-time is best options to handle basic needs for the teenagers, these jobs have worst impact on study and can lead anxiety. An appropriate balance among these could be prove helpful in the life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Veet ganger | 61 | view |
- An increase in production of consumers goods result in damage of the natural environment. What are the reasons and possible solutions. 78
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more recourses in its young people Do you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same. Do you think the advantages of changes outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museum open to the public. What do you think is the best way of finding them, example the government, business or individual. 56
- Modern lifestyle mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the worst'.
Suggestion: have the worst
...sic needs for the teenagers, these jobs have worst impact on study and can lead anxiety. A...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, kind of, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7987987988 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43430395507 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7933128306 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177480630577 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527675402611 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438178316124 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112657822548 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449714965753 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.