Some people think that children should be taught at school to recycle materials and avoid waste. Other people believe that children should be taught this at home.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Recycling materials is one of the task that children should teach in school to avoid waste. However, some people argue that it should be done at home already.
To begin with, recycling of materials is a good task to learn by the children for them to be able to know on how to use the things that already recycled. Some people preferred to learn this task at home and parents should be the first trainer for their child. Young people would like to do this task because it is enjoyable and they can also share this to their friends and when they go to school they already know how to do it. Moreover, they have learned it in advanced at their home.
On the other hand, despite of advanced teaching it at home children would not be interested anymore to learn this at school. For instance, children will not enjoy listening to the discussion about the topic because they know it already. Young individuals have a mindset that everything can learn at school. Indeed, they will not enjoy the group work with their classmate although they have an idea to the task. Young aged people would prefer to learn it with their school classmates because they can build up friendship and respect as well.
To conclude, every task should be taught advanced at home but it is more likely taught and learn in school so that children could learn it with excitement and have fun to learn it with their classmates at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-30 | VINITA SHARMA | 93 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | yash0724 | 56 | view |
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants. 61
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time job and see it as a good thing, while other disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 61
- Many people now have the freedom to work and live anywhere because of advances in communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, well, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61660079051 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25889933224 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4460073603 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338521531478 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158593234043 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10944194089 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276403803962 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10679564309 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.58950901804 76% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.