TPO45
In the passage, the author argues the fact that bees existed on Earth as early as 200 million years ago and bring up three views that doubt existance of bees during that time. However, the professor contends that these theories are not convincing and refutes each of them.
At first, the passage holds the view that no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago and the earliest fossil is 100 million years old. The professor, on the other hand, believes that it is true that there is no fossil from 200 million years ago.However, this is due to the fact that the sticky liquid produced by some kind of tree was rare in that time, therefore the fossil could not be preserved. The fact that there is no fossil that date to 200 million years ago, doesn't mean that bees did not exist in that time.
Additionally, the writer mentions that one reason to doubt existance of bees 200 million years ago is absence of flowering plants in that period, since modern bees feed almost excluslively on the flowers of flowering plants. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this theory by pointing out that the bees existed before flowering plants and they fed on none flowering plants like pine trees. Later, with the advent of flowering plants they adopted to fed on them and they are feeding from flowering plants ever since.
Finally, the author suggests that while the fossilized structures found in Arizona are somewhat similar to nest chambers made by modern bees, they lack some of the finer details of bees' nests. On the contrary, the professor states that some chemical evidences on that structures show that they are chemically same as water proof mater created by modern bees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
- TPO50 3
- TPO48 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 55 Writing 1Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number 78
- TPO52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...is no fossil from 200 million years ago.However, this is due to the fact that the stick...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sil that date to 200 million years ago, doesnt mean that bees did not exist in that ti...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 153, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...chambers made by modern bees, they lack some of the finer details of bees nests. On the con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 318, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...s show that they are chemically same as water proof mater created by modern bees.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, kind of, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81879194631 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31177611695 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503355704698 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.333286385 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852941846348 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393953439102 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274301526885 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514482973239 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111728880624 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.