The preposition here argues, how discussion between people with contrasting view point can contribute to overcome an impasse. The gist of this argument lies in the vision to differentiate discussion with conclusion. Most often people confuse discussion with conclusion and percept that it is the other person whose ideas are going to dominate, putting his ideas in the back seat or even trash at sometimes. Further analysis will make one decipher this enigma.
Firstly, we should try to understand the motive behind organizing a parley by any functionary. It is assumed that any meeting conference will render everyone equal opportunity to put their view points for assessment and final decision will be taken unanimously. It’s very natural to have differing opinions, since everyone has its own way of thinking. In fact, one should prefer to discuss matters with people having contrast point of view to mitigate the differences or to come to conclusion which is in the interest of both. Consider for example, the trade war of U.S. and China. Although they are yet to come up with a conclusion, but there is still a hope of ray due because of the continuous negotiation’s efforts and several rounds of meetings. Had these two countries, largest economies of the world, denied to discuss the matter, the situation would have gone worse and who knows even the recession clouds could be looming.
In addition to that, one should not avoid discussion considering himself/herself always superior to others at least, not before the discussion. Rather, the top management should encourage everyone to come up with ideas of their own to help tackle the slowing growth or other issues, if any. The concoct of solutions will not only provide a panoramic view of the problem itself but it will also alleviate them choose the feasible solution, which may be a cocktail of ideas.
On the contrary, the idea of discussion- involving people with opposite view points- could turn nasty sometimes paving the way to exacerbate the dead lock situation. This will further lead to no conclusion at the end of the meeting which can have devastating outcomes. In the UN meeting, for instance, we have seen some similar instances. During 1999, United Nations Security Council meet, the Israeli and Palestinian UN representatives were involved in a scuffle due to opinion differences. That scuffle later mutated into serious fights and the two representatives were seen throwing fisticuffs at each other. This was no good impression from such an esteemed international organization.
So, in conclusion the mood of people with opposite mindset must be very closely scrutinized before assembling them around the table. Otherwise, instead of resolving the differences the differences will turn into animosity.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 58
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 70
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the largest'.
Suggestion: , the largest
...nds of meetings. Had these two countries, largest economies of the world, denied to discu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'denied discussing'.
Suggestion: denied discussing
...ntries, largest economies of the world, denied to discuss the matter, the situation would have go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...slowing growth or other issues, if any. The concoct of solutions will not only provide a pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, which may be a cocktail of ideas. On the contrary, the idea of discussion-...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the differences'.
Suggestion: the differences
... table. Otherwise, instead of resolving the differences the differences will turn into animosity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e differences will turn into animosity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24944320713 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92988621164 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594654788419 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0604034713 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.136363636 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196524968143 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538803639775 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558804108636 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102998902404 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515706243856 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.