Government officials are granted positions of power on the premise that they will serve their community. Given that a government official is expected to meet the needs of a diverse community with a wide array of interests, it is not practical for him or her to neglect his her own reasoning and judgment. Government officials should rely on his or her judgment in tandem with the best interests of his or her constituency.
In many cases, such as in a representative democracy, government officials are elected to serve and represent and execute the policies and protect the interests of their constituents. The authority afforded to government officials is defined by the social contracts of experience and judgment. To negate a fundamental expectation of this contract will produce ineffective leadership and lackluster political outcomes. Such a proposal also neglects the expectations of the governed that their leaders be seasoned communicators, negotiators, and innovators.
A government official who unquestioningly and inscrutably follows the wishes of his or her constituents, cannot be an effective one. In many cases, the masses do not have access to the resources and information to make fully-informed decisions about political issues. Additionally, the will of the people changes rapidly and unpredictably, at times. Therefore, it becomes the responsibility for a public servant to faithfully execute the role that they have been entrusted with judiciously and carefully.
If a government official does not exercise his or her judgment, then it creates a vacuum of power and a culture of indecisiveness. Countries, states, and other forms of organizations cannot survive without some form of a hierarchy of ideas and their execution. Without a judicious leader, social conflict and differences will be exacerbated and polarized. This vacuum of power lends itself to political, social, and economic instabilities that have far-reaching implications.
Government officials are required by law to be of a certain age, demonstrate the strength of his or her character, be decisive and judicious in the offices that they hold. These expectations are in place on the basis of a social contract government officials will perform beneficial work their communities. He or she or she should recognize the limitations in his or her own judgment, limitations of his or her constituents, and serve to complement them in an effective and expedient manner. A government official who overvalues the popularity and broad acceptance of his or her constituents cannot effectively lead and produce desired outcomes.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serveWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasonin 66
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offeredby nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omnishowed a signif 55
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 55
- Science is meaningless without religion. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'or she'.
Suggestion: or she
... beneficial work their communities. He or she or she should recognize the limitations in his...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, therefore, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51485148515 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39481619276 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492574257426 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5997302325 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.263157895 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184417386652 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647687494654 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406760082958 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112432862739 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410412063205 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.