Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible
Since without money no good idea can be implemented, the responsibility of corporations is to make as much money as possible without violating any law.
There is virtually nothing what money cannot buy. Money making is the goal of every corporations and if corporations can earn enough money then at same time charity work can be done. In Bangladesh, Grameenphone is the leading network corporation and they make the largest amount of profit in Bangladesh. While other companies provide many offers and discounts, it is Grameenphone who never allows any discount for the mobile users and they charge the greatest amount of call rate compared to the other companies. Though they did some charity work at the beginning of their journey, today no such activity of charity work can be observed. This is because perhaps their target was making money as much as possible and for this, they wanted to make their company renowned at first through charity work, but as soon as they earned their reputation they gave up those work to fulfill their goal. It is Grameenphone whose share are most expensive in the share market and in order to become a successful like Grameenphone, new corporations must follow their foot print.
Similarly, Robi, a growing telecommunication corporation in Bangladesh opened their company at the year of 2010, when started their journey they did maney charity work: they sponsored local sports, national events and by those activities they earned their name to compete against Grameenphone. But at present, though they are among the top money making company they kept themselves out from doing much charity work. So, doing charity can be a part of the mission of a corporation for becoming a successful money making corporation, ultimately.
However, it is the society in which the corporations serve, and it is their responsibility to serve the society and environment. But, the utmost goal of corporations should be earning as much money as possible without violating the law and if they can do it in some stage of their journey they may themselves involve in charity work like Microsoft is doing now. Microsoft, though, at present do many charity work but their initial goal was to make as much money as possible and now they are getting themselves involved in charity work but they maintain money making as their utmost goal and in broader sense they should do so because without money making no corporation will thrive and ultimately the society will be deprived
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | fugitate | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | underwoodkats1 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment. 66
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meals that students do not find enjoyable – my son and several of his friends came home yesterday compla 39
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02415458937 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78236231632 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466183574879 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5674074478 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219515704884 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997203161079 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477428088982 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159956937556 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285571096417 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.