The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the number of squander manufactured by company A, company B and company C in the year; 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015. The amount of waste is measured in tonnes.
Overall, it can see that the amount of waste produced by company A gradually decreased over the year while company C gradually increased. Company B at some point it rose and later it started diminishing.
On the one hand, company A started with 12 tonnes of produced squander in the year 2000 but gradually decreased as the year progressed until it plummeted to nearly 8 tonnes of waste in 2015, where company C gently rose and it started from around 4 tonnes of waste in 2000 and then progressively increased reaching its highest peak in 2015( around 10 tonnes of waste produced).
On the other hand, company B in 2000 produced around 8 tonnes of squander and it surged till 2005 about 10 tonnes. From 2005 it started synching and in 2015 it reached to 3 tonnes of waste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005. 67
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 73
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 67
- Feedback and evaluation are necessary aspects of school and work, but many people dislike being evaluated. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63953488372 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55514491741 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.396403838 43.030603864 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158948569355 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878484820278 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547670416127 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11529184324 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489158249338 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.