The issue raises a debate about a problem that people spend a lot of time on their work and reduce their leisure time. The point of dispute calls for its analysis by various perspectives. However, it seems that it causes many negative effects.
There are a plethora of problems associated with this phenomenon. The most prominent is that a gap between personal life and professional life is appeared, and people spend less time with their families and friends. Furthermore, another critical concern is working for long hours in offices causes some problems with health, for example, obesity, hypertension and depression. To cite an example on this question, a study conducted by the University of Western Australia has shown that people spending too much time on their work have a 20% more chance of heart disease than people who work part-time.
This problem can be solved according to the following rationale. Essentially, it is crucial to note, that employees should work part-time or take a day off in the middle of the week. Moreover, this solution is well supported by the fact that they can pay much more attention to their children and friends having free time together in the cafes, gyms, art galleries or cinemas. Hence, it apparent that there several impressive solutions.
Summing up all the point above, it can be concluded that there is no doubt that the harmful effects of working too much on their jobs are indeed too great to ignore.
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage What problems it cause 83
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems it cause 55
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61082869774 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608163265306 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7932692078 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.916666667 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386415857874 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117846905446 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100197921294 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214992098996 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955578506123 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.