In some countries, more and more people are buying imported food rather than buying food produced locally. Why do people buy imported food? What can be done to encourage people to buy locally produced food?
Based on the development of international trade, indigenous residents are likely to get familiar with imported food as a global phenomenon. It deems to be a controversial issue in many nations because this trend leads to the wreck of domestic food products. Therefore, I strongly believe that both the political and individuals have to figure out some optimal solutions to address this problem.
On the one hand, it is comprehensible that there are two prime reasons in this circumstance. The first deciding factor is that many local residents are fond of imported food due to their outstanding quality. In some Asian countries where the quality local food is inadequate or there are still a host of chemicals in food products. Consequently, people have to choose the other items with superior features in order to suppress several detrimental effects to their family’s health. Secondly, there is a common trend in many areas that people prefer foreign goods to the local’s one. Vietnam perfectly exemplified this situation, citizens consumes a tremendous amount of imported food products.
On the other hand, several viable solutions can be implemented to mitigate the aforementioned issue. The authorities may levy a steep tax on imported food as well as financial assistance which are essential to prevent numerous serious effects to domestic goods. As a results, it not only exerts a positive influence on local food but they also boost the socio-economy in their countries. Additionally, indigenous residents should enhance the understanding about this situation. According to many analysis, some experts assert that the awareness of citizens is extremely important to accompany with the development of the country.
To sum up, it is undeniable that both imported and domestic food have their own great potential. I wholly believe that people may advocate the local one in order to maintain the sustainable development of their countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-06 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Nowadays, mass media have a profound impact on shaping people’s idea. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Nowadays, a lot of young people choose to live together under the same roof without officially getting married. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...s serious effects to domestic goods. As a results, it not only exerts a positive influenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 492, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun analysis seems to be countable; consider using: 'many analyses'.
Suggestion: many analyses
...ding about this situation. According to many analysis, some experts assert that the awareness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42345276873 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08421412829 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543973941368 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5941796267 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256930295725 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827047787625 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518967138554 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16254381854 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358792626312 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.