Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Nowadays, research in science, business, and academic persuasions have become an overwhelming need to counter the environmental, financial, and political issues in the coming days. While in these areas should be shared with rising scientists and researchers so that they can bring about something anticipated results, several intense restrictions also are urgent to protect those ideas from wrongdoers and careless people, and I endorse the latter idea on restrictions.
To begin with, since the last centuries research on various fields has been continued, recent practitioners need a reference to work on any topic. Otherwise, people may work on the same issues that were done many years earlier. Moreover, if some wrongdoers can get access to work on exclusive fields such as biological clones or business intelligence, they can direct the project for detrimental purposes. This is one of the main reasons for which information on critical projects should be confidential. Even another unwanted problem may arise that someone may publish the research papers of the genuine author without giving any reference. So, Good projects in science, business, and university should be protected with premium cost or a very strong password.
However, these severe restrictions and excessive costs may deter some prolific researchers to go on working on a crucial subject. For this reason, some people contend that information on sensitive topics should be flexible for enthusiastic learners. However, it is widely supported that if someone gets something easily, the result of the research can be less fruitful. Moreover, these available may drive them to lose passion. Even, it true that free and less working can't bring tremendous success.
In my opinion, most crucial ideas and previous research on something should be kept as a secured file and should supply as premium information. Only the prolific researchers will get into those serious subjects who can commit the betterment of the world. Otherwise, ill-motive people can ruin the world by persuading modern technology.
In conclusion, the aforesaid discussions show that bad sides of sharing data can outweigh the good sides, so the sole promising researchers should be allowed to work previous intense topics so that they can make something good for the world, and I appreciate them rigorously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sheetal Bataniya | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | kuldeep sharma | 93 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet. What are the reasons and solutions? 78
- How do movies or television influence people`s behaviour? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 90
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 438, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ay drive them to lose passion. Even, it true that free and less working cant bring t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ven, it true that free and less working cant bring tremendous success. In my o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48633879781 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8849302278 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587431693989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2857573682 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.117647059 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16284636083 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504441874452 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337577276113 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945775151275 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189354167641 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.