In some areas of the US a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be outdoors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.
What is your opinion about this?
A curfew law is implemented in several territories in the United States for youths unless mature people are with them. The children's freedom might be taken as the adverse effect even though the attempt of crime prevention can be ensured.
The main impact of this uncommon phenomenon is possibly limited activities of United States kids in a day. This is because the approval of older people to escort is an integral part in conducting night activities. However, their spare time are not always available and affects in organising night events probably being hard undertaken by pupils. What is the significant impact of this? An annual prom night event might have a low opportunity to be held regarding its timetable as an illustration. The reason is not each parent's student has a similarity of free time to invite the event with their kids in one time. Despite of this. I believe that this encourages children to accept a high-level protection related to crimes after the dusk of the sun.
Offering a full-cover safety for young generations is a primary benefit because American police officers are incapable 24-hour service. It is caused that criminals tend to commit the action when street's condition is in lonely and lack of surveillance. A 2016 BBC reported that over 50% of criminality witnessed by American teenagers occurred at 08.00 PM and above. Therefore, this regulation is an immediate response to prevent the rise of trauma proportion as a victim from violence and robbery. If the problem wants to completely solve, I believe that local council should issue the new policy since this regulation provides only a short-time solution.
In conclusion, Not permitting teenagers in outdoors is weakness while the merit given is a safety guarantee in the night. It suggested that installing a handful of securities cameras in crime-ridden streets is a long-term step to safeguard pedestrians particularly teenagers in night.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | Fachri040495 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | dwi angraeni hatik | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Andi Mawaddah Hamzah | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Andi Mawaddah Hamzah | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Andi Mawaddah Hamzah | 78 | view |
- the charts below illustrate which is of 3 fast food restaurants are the most preferred amongs teenagers in Vietnam and Indonesia in 2017 and prediction for 2027 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 38
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1990 and 2008 11
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for travelling public in the US in 2009 89
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
- the charts below illustrate which of 3 fast ood restaurants are the most preferred amongst teenagers in Viatnam and In Indonesia in 2017 and predictions for 2027 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a low opportunity to be held regarding its timetable as an illustration. The re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8950814494 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8207471067 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1764705882 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229067921154 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641794411286 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330154117293 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115103257051 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456179683542 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.