fddf
The article states that online degree programs are not as effective as conventional campus degrees and provides three reasons for support. however, the professor cast doubts on those ideas and explains that online degree programs have their own advantages and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading assumes that online programs do not offer one-to-one time interaction of the students with the professors. The professor, however, refutes this point by saying that it is up to the students whether they want to interact with the professor or not. he also states that there are various modes of interaction with professors in online programs such as chat, email and telephonic calls.
Second, the article posits that online degrees are not as challenging or as high quality as the on-campus programs. The professor refutes this claim by saying that the quality of the online courses is up to the mark and provides an example of his students who found out that online courses are not as easy as they had expected. Moreover, online courses require self-discipline as students have to manage technology along with the content of the study.
Finally, the article claims that top schools do not offer online courses. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture opposes this point and states that even top schools provide online courses. he says that every Ivy League colleges except Princeton University offer online courses to the students for the completion of their degree by providing a one-term residency requirement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-10 | mukesh7541 | 3 | view |
- The following were written in response to the task "Working in Teams" on pages196to198.
- t has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? Use specifc reasons and examples to 70
- school work and get a decent night's sleep if you happen to be living in the family home. I can recall a friend from my university days who lived in a share house with other students. Life was a party for him but he didn't eat or study well and 73
- Living independently or living with parents 61
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projectsis to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attacka project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a widerrange of knowledge, exp
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...and provides three reasons for support. however, the professor cast doubts on those ide...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... to interact with the professor or not. he also states that there are various mode...
^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ven top schools provide online courses. he says that every Ivy League colleges exc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26907630522 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63706534681 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510040160643 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7957440164 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.