Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue, leads to a more satisfying working life. To what extend do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, people usually spend their entire lives doing one job. While I accept that stable jobs would lead to a more satisfying working life, I argue that job-hopping will be more beneficial.
On the one hand, I agree that deciding on a career path early and keeping it can allow people to meet stable and comfortable lives. For example, they will not be distressing or feel traumatic as they change their job. Most people afraid of experiencing dramatic shifts since they would concern about the relationship, the adaption or the work-related problems. secondly, sticking to one career would possibly help people get the promotion as well as enhance job performance. For instance, to retain dedicated and skilled employees, plenty of companies offer cool rewarding perks and high salaries.
on the other hand, I believe that people can make progress and enjoy their own working lives by switching their jobs. First and foremost, workers would have a special opportunity for obtaining varied vocational experiences thanks to trying a wide range of professions. secondly, in the age of 4.0 revolution, several people love to step out from their comfort zone to enjoy challenges, not only for their future success but also for their own happiness. Finally, job-hopping encourages people to improve their social skills and expand their relationship, which plays an integral part of the career path.
In conclusion, it can certainly be satisfying to keep a job for the whole of a person's life, but a strongly feel that moving from one job to another could possibly be more advantageous in this age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | Hồng Ngọc Trân | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... adaption or the work-related problems. secondly, sticking to one career would possibly ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...rewarding perks and high salaries. on the other hand, I believe that people c...
^^
Line 9, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... to trying a wide range of professions. secondly, in the age of 4.0 revolution, several ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...h. In conclusion, it can certainly be satisfying to keep a job for the whole of a person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sfying to keep a job for the whole of a persons life, but a strongly feel that moving f...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('strongly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('feel') instead of another adjective.
...ob for the whole of a persons life, but a strongly feel that moving from one job to another cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 150, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...eel that moving from one job to another could possibly be more advantageous in this age.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14885496183 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77070057135 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5741596293 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265174370802 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968431959712 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585943795614 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157983314491 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292258813387 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.