No one can deny that there are pros and cons to computer games especially when it comes to children. If I were forced to choose whether it has a positive or negative impact on children, I would take a stance that it will ruin the children's cognition if they are played too much. It is my firm belief that children become one-sighted if they are indulged in computer gaming, but they need to be multitasking for a number of reasons, which I will develop in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, with the advancement of technology, there are copious of junk game over the internet that is designed to make child addicted. As we know, addiction is dangerous for the development of the mind, which will block the cognition. For instance, drawing from the experience of one of a child from the town, he does have predilection over the games, so that he used to spend plenty of time in front of the computer. Later on, his life became complicated because of too much isolation, from which he is unable to communicate with people. This example demonstrates how computer games ruin the social life of children.
Secondly, children's minds can be molded according to the environment, for which, parents have a great role. If he is given a serene environment to learn new things, then he will develop good character in life, which is blocked by when they are allowed to play computer games. For example, drawing from my own experience, When I was a child, my father used to bring too many books and always not allowed to play computer games. As a result, I got a chance to brainstorm my mind, which led me to create literary works. This would not have been possible if I were not given a tranquil environment to learn by allowing me to play games.
Lastly, I must admit that if children are allowed to play computer games with parental care, they will be benefitted. Some game is designed to boost children's minds, which will help them to become more creative and talented. For example, there are lots of puzzling games that are designed to develop the vocabulary of children. If they were allowed to play these kinds of games, they will obviously develop the word power, which will help them in the academic sector, However, it is not always possible to care about their children for parents. So, It is better not to allow children to play computer games, so that they can boost their mind in other aspects of life.
In light of these above-mentioned reasons, most of the computer games are designed to ruin the children's minds. So, they shouldn't be allowed to play these kinds of games for their own benefit. If in case, they are needed to allow, it should be done with extreme parental care.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people believe school cafeterias should stop selling soft drinks and other high sugar drinks while others think students should have a choice in what they drink Which option do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- nnnnnnnnnnnnn 3
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...d to ruin the childrens minds. So, they shouldnt be allowed to play these kinds of games...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65618448637 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56020081268 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461215932914 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3052476691 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.761904762 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23390431832 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868548840383 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564246566588 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153022338531 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517975141503 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.