Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it is impossible to be completely honest with your friend.
Honesty, as we all know, is our wealth. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, noticing the world is ruled now, one may find this contention sensible. In this regard, conversely, some people are inclined toward this opinion that it is impossible to be completely honest with friends. I am of the opinion that although honesty is adorable, it would bring trouble by revealing something or cause misunderstanding of the truth. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason which makes me hold this belief that candidness with friends is impossible is misunderstanding the truth. Regarding different situations which everyone may undergo, sometimes decisions are between bad and worse which required a person to decide by force. Besides, sometimes different factors which are out of one`s control are involved in one decision, so it makes it difficult and sometimes unreasonable to explain the whole situation for a friend. Even though between friends everything is simpler and easier, in terms of one`s perception, if tell the truth influence negatively on a friend`s mind, the relationship might be destroyed. Although there are many debates about honesty and trust between friends, it is deniable that some facts are not arguable and had taken depend on situations which ones faced with. So, telling the truth may endanger friendship sometimes.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is privacy. Even though friends are confidentiality, there are many issues that are related to the past or to the private life which nobody has the right to know unless one, own self. Indeed, even between friends, some invisible boundaries deter people to reveal all hidden or unspoken sections of their lives. Nowadays, it is widely accepted that even close friends are not totally trustworthy and it would be better for a person to be conservative in sharing private life and do not try to tell every aspect of life or every experience she had. It is unarguable that ones should protect this privacy as much as she can, and if broke this border, and say even mysteries of her life as always said “one`s cannot put the time back” she will open the door for somebody who her intention might be abusing her emotionally or mentally.
To summarize, all contemplating remarks we safely concluded that totally being honest with friends, although admirable it is not possible. In fact, misunderstanding about the situation one endured or a decision one should have taken not only make honesty impossible but make it also unreasonable. Besides, hidden and unspoken sections of life, also boundaries even between friends prevent them from total honesty.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in doing a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment for a company is to spend money to improve the work skills of its employees. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is a sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, may, regarding, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25454545455 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.933575055 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9900805218 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.684210526 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151846684875 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480316489195 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650545456863 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985401849589 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216853630039 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.