Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages?
In modern days, a majority of people prefer corporate conferences and official training online. In my opinion, I think that holding business meetings and training online can bring more drawbacks to individuals compared to any advantages it might bring.
Admittedly, there are numerous gains to conducting business gatherings and instructing virtually. One advantage is that it dissuades the cost of travelling. Since these meetings are taken place online without any need to commute anywhere, it curbs the cost of transportation and time. For instance, KPMG, a finance consultancy firm in Mumbai, regularly conducts business training for its staff to regularly update themselves with new laws and schemes passed by the Indian government. Another advantage is that virtual interaction is that on the office staff in being flexible. To be more precise, individuals can attend these conferences and train online without being the consent of leaving their home and important communications which assist them to be free from the stress of piled up work.
Nevertheless, despite the minimal advantages above, I believe that people can face serious drawbacks from holding company assemblages and enlightening online. The first and most compelling reason is that it lacks to develop a united feeling among team members. In other words, since office staffs are not physically present in the meetings or training, no team activity can be conducted which involves active communication among staff members. Another crucial point to consider is that conducting business meetings and training are dependent on continuous good internet speed and any disruption will affect the flow of the meeting, resulting in failed outcomes or wastage of time for staff members. For instance, according to a recent survey by MoneyKing. com in developing countries in western Asia, 65% of meetings conducted virtually were ruined due to poor internet connectivity
In conclusion, ineffective in developing teamwork among staff members and turbulence due to periodic internet connectivity far outweigh any of the minor advantages that could result from conducting professional conferences and indoctrination online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | kamal_rose96@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | vutum | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | marukap | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Suman1234 | 84 | view |
- You recently organised an all day meeting for your company which took place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch Write a letter to the 84
- Film is a less important form of art than literature and painting To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- You recently travelled on the local bus service in your town You think the driver drove badly and was rude to the passengers Write a letter to the manager of the local bus service In your letter introduce yourself and say when the incident happened descri 87
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company In your letter Describe the item you lost Explain how you lost it Tell the insura 73
- Your local council is considering closing sports and leisure center that it runs In order to save money Write a letter to the local council In your letter give details of how you and your friends or family use the center explain why the sports and leisure 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 757, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Com
...ording to a recent survey by MoneyKing. com in developing countries in western Asia...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, nevertheless, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64350453172 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99451706708 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577039274924 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0007202851 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223063558082 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719779371281 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040566921058 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137191303153 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253211069904 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.