These days, the internet and technology improving too raced in the worldwide. All ages people can use that developing of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, a numerous people prefer to travel and live in their favorite places as well as using social network. While i accept that these live in anywhere can sometimes have a negative sides but i believe that have more likely to have advantages.
On the other hand, this is so dangerous. Because youth generation live more separated from their family and they are want some privacy. Particularly, a number of female living in countryside or suburban. Robbing and kidnapping are increasing on women. For instance, researchers have found that victims of kidnaps are usually female in living alone in suburban.
However, i would argue that these drawbacks are outweighed by benefits. Public places are noisy and chaos. All people live once thus, our life must be happy and peaceful. Technology and vehicles expanded so much. Then people can go anywhere. Outside in city have interesting and fresh air such as- green environment and beautiful silent night. That is like a paradise. Anywhere in worldwide have a network and transport. So, they are return to the city, if they want. In the city, there have much issues. All nations government still can not decide air pollution and traffic jam. Traveling and living in other places have not any natural problems. As well as, you can meet someone who new and clever person and get experiment of life lesson.
By way of conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages. However, from a personal perspective, all people should live in their favorite place.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Mr.Strange
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... as well as using social network. While i accept that these live in anywhere can ...
^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...can sometimes have a negative sides but i believe that have more likely to have a...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have more likely to have advantages. On the other hand, this is so dangerous....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y female in living alone in suburban. However, i would argue that these drawba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... suburban. However, i would argue that these drawbacks are ou...
^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
..., if they want. In the city, there have much issues. All nations government still ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...n the city, there have much issues. All nations government still can not decide air pol...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and get experiment of life lesson. By way of conclusion, there are both adv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72974413227 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2625340926 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.6666666667 106.682146367 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.3333333333 20.7667163134 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207743214984 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506747524956 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396595505705 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121613821426 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426476568203 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.06 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.