Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and
animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and
financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make
extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to
save endangered species.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being or it should not make extraordinary efforts. Indisputably, great cost to money and jobs to save endangered species will affect the society itself and some proportion of society is dependent upon these endangered species. Nevertheless, we are at a point that species are already endangered and we humans share our planet with other species and as the smartest species we should act as a big brother to save the endangered species. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that society should not take extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost and argue that society should try to save endangered species at all cost.
First of all, every species in the nature plays a crucial role in the natural cycle. I would like to point out that the many species are codependent on each others, hence making a very delicate cycle. We humans has exploit them upto a point that they now falls into the endangered species category. To illustrate this codependentness, let us look at the example of fish food cycles in the ocean, where many smaller fishes are dependent upon the left over of the larger fish's food i.e sharks, whales e.t.c. The reduce nos. sharks due to various humans actions has reduce the food supply of these smaller fishes and due to which they die due to scacity of food and following into endangered species category.
These smaller fish plays a crucial roles in society as product from these fishes are used in medical industry and their reduce no. will directly affect our society. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that society should try to save every plant and animal species at all cost as if they let them get extinct society will have to suffer indirectly or directly.
Futhermore, if let suppose that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to
save endangered species then alot of species will extinct and which will create a vaccum in the supply of product that is obtained from that species. If we consider burning or cutting of timber trees which are the major proportion of most of the forests in the world. If they get extinct we will face severe consequences in terms of global warming, scarcity of various important natural resources. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that it important to save the endangered plant and animal species at all cost and it will directly or indirectly benefit the society.
In conclusion, althrough saving the endangered species will be at expanse of human efforts, time and money but in long-run it will benefit the society. Also, it is moral duty to take care of the planet and all the living creatures on it. As long we effecently plan and take some meaurements we will not strain ourself much in order to save the endangered species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | qwertyiitb | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant andanimal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, andfinancial well-being. Others believe that society need not makeextraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leadersmust yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake ofcompromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of aneffective leader is the ability to remain consistently co 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'exploited'.
Suggestion: exploited
...ng a very delicate cycle. We humans has exploit them upto a point that they now falls i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'fall'
Suggestion: fall
...exploit them upto a point that they now falls into the endangered species category. T...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er fishs food i.e sharks, whales e.t.c. The reduce nos. sharks due to various humans actio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sharks
...e sharks, whales e.t.c. The reduce nos. sharks due to various humans actions has reduc...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 564, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...harks due to various humans actions has reduce the food supply of these smaller fishes...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'role'?
Suggestion: role
...y. These smaller fish plays a crucial roles in society as product from these fishes...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Save
...at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species then alot of species...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90297029703 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59876679674 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429702970297 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1219220091 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.315789474 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5789473684 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282152179126 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942947142599 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110114218714 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172331751201 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126835545757 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.