Generally, food is the main reason for our liveliness. The on the upward trend of producing food all around the world demonstrates population growing need for it. However, why?. There is much of a concern to shade a light to the root of this phenomenon.
To begin with, there must be several reasons behind food growing demand. Firstly, statistics have shown that the world's population is on the rise in fast peace. This will be accelerated by hedonic consumption culture which has been cult to the societies during the time. A good example of this is the USA society. They have an upward trend when it comes to the population rate and mostly tend to eat more food than needed such as hamburgers, sausages and etc. Nevertheless, some countries are struggling with food deprivation. Most of African countries are among them in which people might hardly find one meal to eat daily. This illustrates that the world demands more food to fill the gap in poor countries. Hence, the need discussed above is either a result of high population growth rate or overconsumption for enjoyment.
To tackle this phenomenon, three potential solutions could be taken into consideration. First of all, in societies where the population is growing fast, governors must develop a solid strategy to meet the people food request. This could be range from planning for farming to aviculture, sheep breeding or breeding cow. African countries or countries fighting with poverty must receive international help from wealthy countries as the human being are from one body otherwise, they won't be able to overcome this catastrophe.
With regard to the cultural issue behind overconsumption in some wealthy countries, the proper solution would be substituting one culture with a better one. There is no doubt that people can learn new mind model if they have appropriate rule models. Media, as the most powerful tools to make trendiness and arise awareness, by the help of socialists and phycologists are able start a paradigm shift from hedonic consumption to logical eating. Thus, there must be a global consensus through the right culture for consumption.
To conclude, although there is an explosion in the world population and many cultural problems have lead to lack of food in comparison with its demand, planning and executing some strategy could stop the world from starvation.
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.'How far do you agree with this prediction? 73
- Spoken communication is always more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive development or a negative development? 78
- Some people believe that to improve driving standards it is better for drivers to take road safety courses; others think that strict punishment is more effective.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...Firstly, statistics have shown that the worlds population is on the rise in fast peace...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...han needed such as hamburgers, sausages and etc. Nevertheless, some countries are strugg...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09536082474 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82072646105 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1517148675 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157651994404 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511641915714 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041973461204 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942516804924 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424474688942 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.