Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet
The lecture and the reading are mainly about a paining known as "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet" and whether the work is done buy the famous artist Rembrandt. The passage provides three reasons to support that this painting is not painted by Rembrandt, whilst the professor argues against point pointed in the passage and tries to attribute the paining to Rembrandt.
Firstly, passage points out attention to the details is low in the painting. Specially inconsistency in the woman's dress. An this is not a feature of Rembrandt work. But the professor provides the reason why this has happened. She states that recent research and analysis has found that the original painting was modified after hundred years. The fur collar which caused the inconsistency was added in that time. Before that modification the collar was normal servant collar.
Secondly, passage states that in the painting light and shadow do not fit together. Passage points the inconsistency between face lighting and dark fur collar, which does not reflect light. Professor again point out that this is due to the modification mentioned above and before that the collar was lite color which reflects light much better. Which depicts Rembrandt's the mastery of handling light and shadow.
Final fact provided in the passage is about the panel. The current one is made of several pieces of wood glued together and this is not a attribute of any known Rembrandt painting. Professor states that is panel modification was also occurred during the above modification and original painting was on a wood panel. This modification was done to enlarge the panel to increase the value of the painting. She then point out that that wood of the panel was taken from the same tree as the panel of another Rembrandt painting.
In conclusion, passage provides three statements to prove why this painting is not done by Rembradt. But in the lecture professor refute all of them using a recent research finding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | ayumiyazaki | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Kairavishah2001 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rpinisetti8 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | EiLonMask | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 80
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 80
- Sea otters 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...ally inconsistency in the womans dress. An this is not a feature of Rembrandt work...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and this'?
Suggestion: And this
...ally inconsistency in the womans dress. An this is not a feature of Rembrandt work. But...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'An' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: An; This
...ally inconsistency in the womans dress. An this is not a feature of Rembrandt work. But...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...he original painting was modified after hundred years. The fur collar which caused the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...used the inconsistency was added in that time. Before that modification the colla...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... inconsistency was added in that time. Before that modification the collar was normal...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reflect light. Professor again point out that this is due to the modification men...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of wood glued together and this is not a attribute of any known Rembrandt painti...
^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...ase the value of the painting. She then point out that that wood of the panel was tak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536031065 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1207434208 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895700026099 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303095418063 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885492189163 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585496145456 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09183483049 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.