Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

While some people argue that there are more benefits to pick up a teamwork sport like soccer, others hold the opinion that tennis or swimming which requires only the team of one is more helpful. In my opinion, a recreation that involves collaboration, as well as strategy, will definitely be more beneficial.

There are two main reasons why it could be argued that individual contributor sport has more values. The most compelling one for believing that is not everyone has the same physiques to adapt perfectly to a specific sport. In other words, everyone has his own abilities, talents, and features to be advanced in their career as a professional athlete. For example, in order to be a good goalkeeper, a contestant should be at least one hundred and eighty centimeters in height. Another reason is that the national sports federation could devote more attention to only a few individuals in a particular game rather than investing in training a big team. More professional and rigorous training could be taken in place to ensure the athlete gets the most of the investment.

Despite the above argument, I still hold the view that team-played sport proves more beneficial. Indeed, one reason why I take this position is that teamwork plays the most important part of these kinds of competition as the spirit of the game. It is not just the strength of a team member but the contribution of the entire team with different abilities sharing the same interest and target. Furthermore, another reason is the art of strategy and tactics involve behind the game. The competitiveness of a team is evaluated by how each team member connects and collaborates in different situations to maximize the team's strength and minimize the opponent's opportunities.

In conclusion, while both views are commonly held in society, I believe that playing sports in a team brings more advantages. This is because teamwork is not only the spirit of the game but also has strategic tactics inside. Given this situation, it is recommended that the national sports association should give more attention to develop teamwork sports.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-03 namnguyen08 73 view
Essays by user namnguyen08 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ht. Another reason is that the national sports federation could devote more attention ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e same interest and target. Furthermore, another reason is the art of strategy an...
^^
Line 9, column 616, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...in different situations to maximize the teams strength and minimize the opponents opp...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d minimize the opponents opportunities. In conclusion, while both views are comm...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 284, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...on, it is recommended that the national sports association should give more attention ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89968471192 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.135791302 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262074761228 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790473804349 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786451720704 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161346239722 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596676076974 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.