Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more material and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
All countries have their own development strategy, such as increasing people's happiness like Bhutan. Almost people think that the appropriate goal for every nation should be to manufacture more and more estates. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this idea.
Admittedly, by dint of producing more goods, value of export and Gross Domestic Product will improve. As a result, the nominated income as well as the foreign exchange reserve of country will go up considerably. Ironically, by no means could this nation become wealthy and rich if it still has to import all components and chains of production to create commodities. For example, Viet Nam now has to import accessories to resemble and produce car, so the added value is very small. Therefore, the country should develop initially its component industry as well as their technology to build a strong and powerful economy.
On the other hand, by virtue of manufacturing more products, people will have a large source of consumer goods. Hence, the consumer surplus will grow up and buyers will have more opportunities to access the cheaper goods. Nevertheless, though this policy bring economic benefits, it also can cause many environmental and health problem to the public. For instance, in order to increase the quantity of goods, many factories will be constructed and release a lot of gases as well as trash to the environment. Worse, chemistry companies usually let out their toxic waste to the water sources and it leads to many diseases of local people such as cancer, heart attack,... In addition, the amount of money to dealt with the problem of polluted environment and sickness may be even greater than the value of produced goods.
In conclusion, every country should set a goal of sustainable economic development to grow their economy without any drawbacks.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-06-24 | thanhdoan6992 | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information and by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 88
- Some people choose to eat no fish or meat They believe that this is not better for your own health but also benefits the world as whole Discuss these view and give your own opinion 74
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 79
- The diagrams below show the stages in the erosion of a headland Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
the amount of money to dealt with the problem
the amount of money to deal with the problem
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Pay attention to coherence.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 300 350
No. of Characters: 1494 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.162 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.98 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.692 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 110 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.81 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5