national wise curriculum should be made mandatory
The author’s claim that the nation should follow the national curriculum seems logical as education is the fundamental right of every individual to make individual to develop himself into a respectable citizen of the country and to realization of their role in the society, making national wise curriculum make a conducive step towards development of the country that there will be uniformity in the national education and there will equal opportunities for all therefore but one must carefully evaluate the implementation policies of to make these type of changes.
Firstly, it will be beneficial for the students in the bucolic part of the country to cope up with the students in the metropolis. Making no discrimination in the education pattern and the curriculum might help the bucolic talent to grow in hand with the urban fellows. For instances students in the bucolic parts of Arizona study the same curriculum that of students in New York.
Secondly, due to the unavailability of the courses in the bucolic part, one must have to migrate to other parts of the country to study which might be cumbersome for the students. There might be case due to economical conditions one have to drop out or to shift their interest to any other available courses in the particular region, certainly due to these type of conditions country might lose one talent which might prove detrimental in future. For example student interested in research in medicine can certainly be helpful for the country to develop certain medicine which might turn helpful.
Thirdly, due to the same national wise curriculum, the evaluation of the students can be done uniformly so their would be no reasons to take a standardized test to evaluate the student's capabilities and can be helpful for students as they can not be neglected due to some standardized tests.
Although some must argue that the national wise curriculum requires an infrastructure in terms of faculties and lab facilities, stepwise implementation of the policy might help to get a fruitful result and in long run it may provide yielding results for the country.
In conclusion, the national wise curriculum would definitely help students to cope up with the students in the metropolis and similarly, no talent is neglected due to economical or due to unavailability of the courses but one must carefully consider the implementation of the policy or it might turn deleterious
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 63
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 50
- one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urriculum that of students in New York. Secondly, due to the unavailability of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...he students. There might be case due to economical conditions one have to drop out or to s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ne talent which might prove detrimental in future. For example student interested in rese...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the policy or it might turn deleterious
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1256281407 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02810417816 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422110552764 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.111490653 60.3974514979 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.0 118.986275619 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8 23.4991977007 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.21951772744 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229046924193 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941222002295 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698986318111 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133170278004 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670356763279 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 14.1392134831 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 48.8420337079 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 12.1743820225 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 33.5 11.8971910112 282% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.7820224719 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.