The director of large group of hospital argued regarding using new liquid soap hand soap called Ultra Clean, that caused 40% more reduction in terms of hands bacteria in comparison with old-fashion liquid hand soap in certain hospital in Worktown. The argument conclude that, due to significant reduction in infection percentage (20%) among all staff and visitors of hospital after using this hand wash soap ( Ultra Clean) in their hospital, in comparison with other hospitals of the group, they should utilize this other hospitals hand washing sections with this new liquid soap. Wether for staff or visitors of the hospital. Yet, this conclusion is not logically convincing, since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
First, the argument never addressed any statistical information concerning number of people including visitors, doctors and staff who have been infected in other hospitals. So, this assumption can be considered that other hospitals have more visitors and staff than mentioned hospital in Worktown and concluding with out any trusted data is not convincing.
Second, the director claimed that due to 20% fewer reported infection, it can be concluded that ultra clean liquid soap has positive impacts on reduce infection rate at the hospital, Yet, there is an assumption that maybe Yorktown has the specific geographical characteristics and this features caused people getting less infection in comparison with other areas. For example, the hospital in worktouwn could be located in the middle of dessert while other hospitals were located in the most cold area of the country that potentially the probability of getting infected in these areas are higher than hot areas.
Third. there is no data available regarding reported infection and it can be claimed that in worktown hospital some people tends to avoid report their medical records to the hospital and they have never reported their infection at that period of time and this reduction of infection rate can be rooted in this fact. Hence, the evidence in support of the conclusion is not sufficient to support the conclusion of argument.
To sum up, the director of group of hospitals conclude that Ultra clean liquid soap should be utilize in all wash hand section of other hospitals of group, wether for staff sections or visitors, regarding 40% more reduction in hands bacteria and 20% fewer infection report from staff and visitors of Yorktown hospital, yet, the assumptions and comparison criteria is not rationally true and can not be over generalized and the argument might have been strengthened by conducting comprehensive research on all hospitals by considering all geographical and statistical features in order to find out the most accurate results.
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 55
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 434 350
No. of Characters: 2262 1500
No. of Different Words: 180 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.564 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.212 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.727 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 137 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 112 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 36.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 20.42 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.409 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.668 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'concludes'.
Suggestion: concludes
...tain hospital in Worktown. The argument conclude that, due to significant reduction in i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hospital after using this hand wash soap Ultra Clean in their hospital, in compar...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ned hospital in Worktown and concluding with out any trusted data is not convincing. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...as are higher than hot areas. Third. there is no data available regarding reported...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... never reported their infection at that period of time and this reduction of infection rate ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'utilized'?
Suggestion: utilized
... that Ultra clean liquid soap should be utilize in all wash hand section of other hospi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to find out the most accurate results.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 434.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33410138249 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.754408566 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.8473053892 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 153.417703462 57.8364921388 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 210.454545455 119.503703932 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4545454545 23.324526521 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129211826041 0.218282227539 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537327621589 0.0743258471296 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822181454385 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754743007799 0.128457276422 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07391861686 0.0628817314937 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 14.3799401198 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 48.3550499002 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.197005988 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.1389221557 158% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.