Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Overpopulation and traffic congestion has become a major concern for many countries, yet arguments about its solutions were to not be ceased. In fact, many people agree that relocating large companies can properly address this issue, in which I partially agree.
First and foremost, moving large factories will provide substantial space for traffic and reduce housing requirements. Successful cooperations employed thousands of workers, and each individual in that company requires accommodation. By transferring, the government releases a heavy burden for the urban population. Since lands and space in the urban area are limited, it is crucial to let every citizen have a home rather than struggling getting a house for themselves. Another apparent advantage of the decreased population is minimizing traffic congestion. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh city, most employees travel to work by private vehicles. As the number of people in an area increases, transportations rises significantly. This is the most alarming cause of traffic congestion in a developed city, especially in rush hour. If cooperation can move their staff to a rural area and provide them accommodation, this problem will be settled.
However, relocating people and companies is a minor solution to a complex situation like overpopulation. The credibility of a nation’s government will decrease if they forcefully persuade residents to live in a different area. In addition, not every company will accept to provide a decent living space for their workers, which will make citizens question the government’s morale. A better solution for traffic problems would be reconditioning and constructing road systems. Narrow roads are the main cause of traffic congestion because their capacity is not sufficient for a developing society. Industrialization is also necessary for cities, and governments should execute this method without damaging the environment.
In conclusion, overpopulating leading to traffic and housing problem is critically increasing in most nations. Although transferring large companies, factories, and people to a rural area is executed productively in many countries, it is significant to consider other solutions before taking further actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | Khiem Duy | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-18 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
- The young people in the workforce are changing their jobs or careers every few years. What do you think are the reasons? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment? 73
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 84
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 70
- The young people in the workforce are changing their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is issue, in which I partially agree. First and foremost, moving large factori...
^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to get'.
Suggestion: to get
...izen have a home rather than struggling getting a house for themselves. Another apparen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dation, this problem will be settled. However, relocating people and companies...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hod without damaging the environment. In conclusion, overpopulating leading to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78443113772 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34856515452 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601796407186 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7443599189 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.684210526 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181956969382 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533405206998 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512684318466 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117070524158 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299971941363 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.