In the last two decades, people consume food at the highest level in comparison with any time in history. There are several social movements against increment of food consumption however many socialists believe that there are solutions to meet this human being’s basic need in order to mitigate problems arisen from this fact.
The first trouble of food demanding growth has appeared in the behavior of people which affects our societies and lifestyles. There are many debates that alarm consuming as the result of materialism is a detrimental factor for our ethics and values which have been protected by generations. For example, a young girl who buys and eats edible products becomes a civilized person who does not respect any immaterial and intangible thing because she just pays attention to goods that could be eaten, worn or consumed. The second difficulty of food wanting more than normal is the resource provision. We are aware that our mother nature is not able to serve us meal unlimitedly and we participate in a battle with our environment to meet the desire. For example, in these years humans intend to substitute meat products with vegetable and this causes many brutal damages to plants and herbs in the ecosystem.
Nevertheless, there is a hope that universal communities could handle meeting the food desire of global society. Recent research has been demonstrated successful experiments in manufacturing alternatives of herbs and meat as cooking materials. For instance, a method has been invented to produce a substance instead of original beef which contains the same nutrition information. Also, international organizations can invest in the optimization of traditional agriculture and ranching with modern instruments or smart devices. For example, a smart farm with monitoring temperature and sunlight has been popular in many developed nations because that prepares more efficiency.
In conclusion, desiring for food with an unbelievable pace is inevitable for the current situation and we should deal with problems and negative outputs. The answer to this circumstance is the entrance of large companies and multinational associations to solving the existing dilemmas swiftly.
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 67
- Some people think that the automobile has improved modern life. Others think that the automobile has caused serious problems. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- tpo 8.Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 90
- Some people think that family is the most important influence on young adults. Other people think that friends are the most important influence in young adults. Which view do you agree with? Use examples to support your position. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gate problems arisen from this fact. The first trouble of food demanding grow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46086956522 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99109649879 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617391304348 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0798537693 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167084251058 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052970942609 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352034851878 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099810504488 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00479915687238 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.