TPO 4
Transportation is done in many ways, and of one the paramount means of transportation is personal cars. I am of the conviction that the number of private vehicles is going to decrease gradually, to an advantageous society. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will interpret in the following essay.
First of all, environmental pollution has become a critical problem in recent years, and cars add to this problem. For one thing, studies assert that urban places, with more cars, are much polluted compared to rural areas. For another thing, personal cars are much older, compared to public vehicles; therefore, they pollute the air, soil, and water more compared to other transportation means. If it wasn't for these cars, the total earth pollution would decrease. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was a college student, I lived in a capital city, with lots of air pollution. I had a friend with lung problems and she was always frustrated and tired because of her health condition. Once, she went to a doctor to consult about her condition, and the specialist told her to leave the city to a place without cars. She left school and our city for one semester, and the result was mesmerizing, she was no longer suffering. As a result, she made a campaign to reduce personal vehicle usage, and thanks to her our city has become less polluted since then. For this reason, I believe that people would understand all the pollution a car can make, sooner or later, and try to decrease its usage.
Ostensibly, private cars are more convenient for transportation, but the trend is already changing in many developed countries. Granted, the car's convenience we will use them, but public transportation's feasibility is changing this matter. For instance, When I first came to Japan, a relatively developed country, I became surprised about their transportation system. That time I had a professor with a high income.
He could buy as many cars as he wanted, but he always commutes between school and home with a subway. Once, I asked him about the reason, and he said that subways are faster, less tiring, and less bothersome. He was completely right about his assumption; consequently, I have stopped using my car since then. This plan paves the way for both my expenditure, and time management, and I believe that more and more people will choose public transporting instead of the car in the future.
In conclusion, I am of the option that, cars will be used less in the future, It is because they make lots of pollution and because public transportation will be more convenient by then.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ed to other transportation means. If it wasnt for these cars, the total earth polluti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...onvenience we will use them, but public transportations feasibility is changing this matter. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion will be more convenient by then.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, another thing, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86607745883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 5.43587174349 386% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 14.0 0.809619238477 1729% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5092459661 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0869565217 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.