People can eat a wide variety of food from other regions. As a result, they are eating a lot of foreign food instead of locally produced food. Do you think the advantages of eating foreign foods are more than their harms?
We are leaving in a global village, so anyone can enjoy a wide variety of delicious foods from all over the world. However, this phenomenon has caused an alarm to local food suppliers. It has both pros and cons. I think it is more fruitful to accept international foods if we see its long-term benefits.
Proponents of foreign foods cite a host of advantages. Obviously, internationally produced foods or their raw materials have to be imported to the home country. If any nation welcomes such deals, it may get a chance to establish many international trades between those countries. This would not create only a healthy relationship, but also it will give rise to a particular nations' economy. Popular food chain like Macdonald, for example, has invested a heavy amount of money across many developing nations including India.
Besides, people always look for a change in every aspect of their life, specifically, in terms of foods, taste, and quality. As a result, a common man can order Italian foods, Chinese foods, and many more while sitting in a corner of the world. And, this scenario has become more popular because such foods come through a procedure of quality checks. These practices obviously increase the 'happiness index' of people and it is good for the word.
On the other hand, the arm any drawbacks, which foreign foods bring. It is well known that such survivals are often costlier than locally produced foods. In fact, ordinary men cannot afford these foods because the concern governments impose heavier taxations on them like goods and services tax. As a consequence, the overall inflation rate of a nation rises gradually. Ultimately, civilians have to bear the negative effects of these international foods.
In conclusion, it is worth to accept foreign foods if we see the current benefits that many developing nations are getting. Even the drawbacks of these foods can be compensated through one or more ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-04 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what toprint in newspapers. What factors do you think influence thesedecisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it he better ifmore good news was reported? 67
- Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main resources in many nations, but in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- In many cities and towns, the high volume of road traffic is a problem. What are the causes and what are the solutions? 78
- Some people think that competitive sport should be included as a subject in school while others believe that it has negative effect on children Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- many people buy new phones or laptops to keep up with the latest technology. Is it a good or bad thing? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... also it will give rise to a particular nations economy. Popular food chain like Macdo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08385093168 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75387925147 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61801242236 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1556388668 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.85 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307775185625 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884075856607 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708852986755 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173960725897 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454318911831 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.