Older vs. new friends
We need to communicate with people, specifically with our friends; therefore, staying with your older friends vs. making new friends is one of the highly controversial issues among many of us. As far as I am concerned in a state of ambivalence I might learn to be with my older friends. Ostensibly, some people may believe that we should find new friends, because we will obtain new experiences talking to them and improve our social appearance, however, I can declare the higher beneficiary of keeping our older friends, because we will make stronger relationships with them; also, we will share more memories with them. Finally, the most paramount reason is that older friends are typically more reliable compared to new ones.
First, we need strong relationships to enjoy our life. In fact, when one makes new friends, the knowledge regarding that person lacks in many aspects; things such as the behavior, family relationships, favorites, etc. would not be learned in a short time. Granted all of this little information contributes to the strength of a relation, but short relation cannot give them. As an illustrative example, when I was in high school, one of my old friends was allergic to mango. My friend’s new friend held a party for her birthday, serving a mango cake, not knowing about the possible allergic reaction. Unfortunately, my friend ended up at the hospital, and it was her worst birthday, ever. Definitely, my friend was not angry, given the explanation, but they never forget the incident. Therefore, to make strong relations, one needs lots of information about friends, and information obtainment associated with the time.
Second, with a longer time to spend with a person, you share more memories. One cannot start talking about the shared childhood memories upon seeing a new person. Most of the time we talk about our memories with our friends; without such kind of memories, it would be hard to find a topic to make more memories. For example, some years ago, my sister invited her friend home to spend a night with her. That night they slept sooner than us, as they had nothing to talk about. So, to improve the relationship with someone one needs to share memories and therefore spend lots of time with that person.
Third, older friends tend to be more reliable. When we have problems, we prefer to consult with somebody who we know for a long time. This happens because we can rely on their honesty and help. For instance, when I have some academic problem and I need someone to consult with, the first person I am thinking of is my oldest friend. Therefore, we need reliable friends, and most of the times they are our oldest friends.
Consequently, I am of the conviction that the older friend is better. This is because we make strong bonds, have lots of shared memories and rely on them the most, but it would not harm to make new friends. So, for the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that longer relationships will be a better choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... controversial issues among many of us. As far as I am concerned in a state of amb...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85909980431 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71337481206 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465753424658 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5906037111 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6785714286 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96428571429 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243190864601 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769003939539 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903969520129 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149574024132 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893881065722 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.