the pie charts show the change of annual spending by local authorities in some land in 1980, 1990, and 2000
The pie charts give information the variation pattern of the level of yearly expenditure for various fields by regional government in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
As can be seen from the charts, it is clearly evident that patterns of spending on different aspects varied over the time frame. While the money amount used for environmental services witnessed an upward trend, other fields tended to decline. Additionally, both of the percentage of payment for higher education, transportation and health and human resources were constantly changed.
In 1980, the allocation of budget on higher education and health and human resources accounted for 35% and 14% respectively. These figures went up to 45% and 20% in 1980 before having a downward trend in 2000, equivalent to 40% and 10%. Unlike these sectors, the proportion of expenditure on transportation was 16% in 1980, then it only had 6% left in 1990 and dramatically climbed to 22% at the end of the period.
In the early stage, the environmental services took up 4% of the total local budget. This number gradually rose to 9% at the end of the studies time. An opposite trend that can be observed from the charts is the percentage of fee budget that authorities paid for K12-education’s and other fields. This disbursement of money fell from 25% and 6% to 18% and 1% relatively, marked the decrease in the amount of outlay for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | linhlinh2801 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96610169492 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02132609561 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6700447669 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146617837659 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048994025221 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552220965769 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958852820328 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659333209228 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.