The bar chart below shows the average Australian water consumption in selected cities for last year. The pie chart shows the distribution of Australian water consumption for last year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the average Australian water use in 6 selected cities for last year, while the pie chart describes the share of water each industry consumed in 2014.
Overall, Perth had the highest average water use for last year with 300 kilolitres per property, followed by Adelaide and Brisbane with 240 and 250 kilolitres of property respectively. On the other hand, Melbourne and Canberra showed the lowest average water consumption of 150 and 140 kilolitres respectively.
Taking a look at the distribution of water use by industries, we can clearly see that Agriculture took over two thirds of the entire consumption 67%, followed by households 9%. Water Supply, Sewage and Drainage industry consumed the same amount of water as the Electricity sector, 7%. In the same way there was no difference between the consumption of Manufacturing and Other industries, with both sectors using 4% of the national water supply. The smallest user was the Mining industry, accounting for just 2% of Australian water use.
To conclude, the city of Perth and the Agriculture industry had a major impact on the usage of Australian water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-21 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, third, while, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20430107527 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89961942476 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.292856399 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394587614973 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165384574117 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121172527095 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244444507872 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136231512594 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.