summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure to
explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species .
The article states that saving endangered species are unnatural and has several disadvantages and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that contrarily to article people should prevent from extinction of animals whenever possible. Also he mentions that loss of each species has real consequences and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading states that many claim extinctions of each animal leads to ecological disaster but it is exaggeration. The professor refutes this point by indicating that although author support his attitude by giving an example of dinosaurs, their extinction led to dramatic shift of organisms that dominated the earth surface. He then explains that since we currently dominate the earth, we should maintain of animals which means preserving our own life from peril.
Second, the article claims that technologies such as genetic engineering make scientist independent of nature for source of medication. However, the professor contends that it is true that genetic is an important field, but still nature has its own power in medication. The professor mentions that now 40 percent of drugs are composed of natural materials from plants. He highlights that only a small percentage of plants have been studied for their medical applications and everyday one hundred species become extinct, so each extinction of species deprive us from noticeable opportunity for medical research.
Third, the reading avers that huge cost which spends to support endangered species is often not justified. The lecture opposes this point by saying that fresh water mussel is more important for economic advantages. Unfortunately, 43 percent of fresh water is endangered or already extinct and still remaining species creates 10000 jobs and add 700 million to the U.S economy. According to the professor, these species along with many others deserve to be saved if only for economic purpose.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinion of celebrities, such as entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture about solutions to frog population decline, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about frog population decline. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- : Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...xtinction of animals whenever possible. Also he mentions that loss of each species h...
^^^^
Line 13, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...10000 jobs and add 700 million to the U.S economy. According to the professor, t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, third, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52159468439 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75719087516 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607973421927 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5867041171 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164601361781 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555614505805 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426815609845 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100993073002 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488783481203 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.