There are lots of ways to know the character of a society, including knowing that society’s peoples’ beliefs, their policies and their behavior. During the history, lots of people were known as heroes. Depends on the situation and the decisions that have been made by the leaders or some remarkable people, they might be counted as the other’s role models. Some would think that examining the characters of mentioned people, would be the best way to know the characters of the whole society. Personally, I take issue with above assumption for lots of reasons.
The first reason why I abjure mentioned idea, is that, sometimes, heroes are been selected just by the majority, not all of them. Owing to the fact that the society is filled with different people and therefore different schools of thoughts, majority will not be the whole. A person would be known as a hero for lots of people, while, exactly that person would be known as the betrayer to the country. So the majority’s selection would not be the whole ones.
What is more, even if all people select a hero as their society’s representative, it doesn’t mean, that person is really the representative of the whole society. For example when a political authority, as a case in point, is chosen as the president of a country, by all members of that society’s vote, and then he turns out to be an exploiter of his position, or being known as a liar, as a representative of whole country, tag of being liar should be stock to each members of that society?
Moreover, the role models can not been counted as a person who reveals the society’s highest ideal, due to the fact that every time, the situation is changing. I remember when we were children, our president was our hero, since after war he helped people a lot, and he defended our rights, but nowadays, no one in our new generation know him, but in contrast everyone know famous superstars. And there would be no surprise if we see that they have been selected as their role models. To wrap up, since the role models would change during the times and generations, they would not be good criteria for knowing the society.
By and large, I subscribe to the theory that heroes, or role models will not reveal the whole society member’s ideal, and as the consequence they cannot be representatives of the society. Therefore, examining them would not be the best way for knowing a society.
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 70
- A multi-national corporation should require all of its employees to learn several languages in order to advance within the corporation. 70
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 40
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 66
- For the past six years Coach Mauro has been the football coach at Silver Lake High School and during that time the football team from Silver Lake High has won three national football championships In addition the number of fans attending each football gam 45
heroes are been selected just by the majority,
heroes are being selected just by the majority,
no one in our new generation know him, but in contrast everyone know famous superstars
no one in our new generation knows him, but in contrast everyone knows famous superstars
Sentence: For example when a political authority, as a case in point, is chosen as the president of a country, by all members of that society's vote, and then he turns out to be an exploiter of his position, or being known as a liar, as a representative of whole country, tag of being liar should be stock to each members of that society?
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to each and members
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 423 350
No. of Characters: 1916 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.535 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.53 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.505 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.882 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.423 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.352 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.132 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5