Issue:
Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
The given claim that any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future is justified with a reason that much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. I think the assumption behind this claim and reason is that the world has witnessed many such fact which were proven false with the time. In past people used to believe that the sun and other planet revolve around the earth but it was proven wrong. Similarly in the past people use to believe that the cause of illness was the curse of God but it was also proven false. There are numerous example in the womb of past which make us believe that the fact should not be believed unless detail study is conducted on the fact because there is potential to be proven false in future.
Any piece of information that is referred as fact has equal potential to be true or to be false. In the past the sun revolves round the earth was a fact for a people which they were believing from long time. When Galileo put forward the fact that it was the earth who revolves round the sun, the church and people were against him. But Galileo was proven right in later time. Similarly, people used to believe that the reason behind illness was the curse of god. But when microorganism causing disease were observed, the fact was replaced by new fact. During the Wright brother time, people cannot fly in air like a bird was a fact but it was proved wrong by the invention of airplane. Thus the fact should not be believed as true unless a detail information is available in it.
Any fact provided cannot be taken completely true in any field. The fact that is true for the present can be proven false in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | AAAA2222 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal compan 50
- Issue:Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ound the earth but it was proven wrong. Similarly in the past people use to believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ven wrong. Similarly in the past people use to believe that the cause of illness wa...
^^^
Line 1, column 829, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e there is potential to be proven false in future. Any piece of information that is ref...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...arth was a fact for a people which they were believing from long time. When Galileo put forwar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ved wrong by the invention of airplane. Thus the fact should not be believed as true...
^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rue for the present can be proven false in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, similarly, so, thus, well, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43209876543 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23471070753 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432098765432 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5318804286 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462442272873 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174793032162 0.0831039109588 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209315790116 0.0758088955206 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343839250297 0.150359130593 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140569216097 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 12.1639044944 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 100.480337079 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.