Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion?
It is obvious that artificially intelligent robots are progressively replacing human in the labor force. While it is possible that some tedious jobs will be eventually done by robots, I believe that jobs requiring human contact will never be taken over.
It is apparent that artificial intelligent robots can take over human labor that does not require specific or complex human skills. Since it is far less expensive to operate robots, compared with hiring, training and employing a human, many companies will turn to artificial intelligence. A tangible example is cashiers in supermarket in Australia. By replacing all the cashier by automated stations, which can work throughout the years, without requiring holiday or holiday extra pay, a large amount of money can be saved and diverted into solving other problems, particularly, maintaining facilities. That means, in the future, menial jobs that can be replaced, will eventually be replaced by robots.
Conversely, I believe that there are still some human jobs that cannot be substituted by robots even the most advanced one as they will never have that capacity to do them. To illustrate this point, jobs including education, psychology and medication play excellent examples here. Because these jobs require sophisticated social skills and emotional connection, it is impossible for robotic intelligence to take human place in these fields. In fact, a robot teacher fails easily to motivate, share emotional relationships with students and improvise during the lesson, which implies that what has taken human thousands of years to achieve will never be achieved by a machine.
In conclusion, it seems to me that almost unskilled human labor will be eventually conducted by robots, but still some human sophisticated jobs such as teacher, will continue to exist no matter what.
- Many employees may work at home with modern technology Some people claim that it benefits only worker but not employers Do you agree or disagree 81
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the negative aspects of this trend outweigh the positive aspects 50
- Scientist say that in the future, humanity will speak the same language. Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion? 78
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41522491349 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88480478263 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6521195075 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34956781003 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130902148538 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112361008481 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249065454025 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088566345951 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.