Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Decisions play an integral role in modern life. Undeniably, it has a powerful influence on the person we will be, and its effect is often positive. Millions of people think we have too many options in these years. This essay will argue that comparing with pasts; We are facing numerous choices in recent years.
The fear of lack of choices has been increased between certain demographic societies. For one thing, they think dramatic advances in technology can thrust robots into businesses faster and more than before. Robots can do exhausting actions for around the clock. Managers might find this as a cost-cutting measure and substitute their workforce with robots. Another thing is that with population blast in recent centuries, competition for finding jobs became more serious. An example may help clarify the point. In China, the labor force is very cheap, merely because of their numbers. It is for these reasons that people start to believe their choices have been decreased.
On the flip side, others believe that they get bewildered by too many choices that they are confronting every day. In the first place, advertising not only drums up our options to buy our needs but also entails a grave confusion by the number of products. As an illustration, when starting to walk in a mall, you will find specific merchandise in different varieties. In the second place, television has become people's' most hobby, and they spend hours watching the magic box. Even though they know watching the one-eyed monster is a waste of time, they mesmerized by the number of channels and programs that exist these years. In other words, back to 50 years ago, nowadays we have a wide choice, much more than we think.
By comparing and contrasting now and then, I firmly believe that in recent years, we have options more than ever. There is a myriad of stance in favor of my stands. Firstly, Doctor Bennet, head of the IT department of MIT, asserts that with progress in technology, humankind can open many doors that were closed before. We can bring new science such as robotics, medical engineer, nuclear physics. It means new technologies can be used to smooth over humans' situation. Secondly, the latest figures released by The World Health Organization (WHO) reflect that the rate of mental health decreased gradually every year throughout the world, and its main culprit is the pressure of dilemmas. Despite the fact that having too many choices are desirable, it can bring a toll on us.
To sum up, this essay argued that the number of our choices had been significantly increased in recent years. Nevertheless, the question is: Can this improve the health and happiness of humans in general? Only time will tell, but in the meantime, it will continue to influence every aspect of our everyday lives.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- What are the pros and cons of children watching television 84
- How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommuting 56
- Many people believe we should continue developing cloning technology To what extend do you agree or disagree 92
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades. While some people see this as a positive trend that raises the general level of education within the community, others fear that it is lowering the 84
- The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. to what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...stands. Firstly, Doctor Bennet, head of the IT department of MIT, asserts that with pr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...technologies can be used to smooth over humans situation. Secondly, the latest figures...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, another thing, in general, such as, for one thing, in other words, to sum up, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94279661017 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54525877875 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3658248124 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3214285714 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.96428571429 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2356573168 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569555444439 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640409757385 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125849523261 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473214372691 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.