The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature. and make comparison where relevant.
The illustration presents the processes of black tea production in separate various ways. Overall, it is noticed that both include five steps which starting with harvesting green leaves and drying them at the end.
In the beginning, the high quality of tea leaves is picked by hand. Soon after, using an air ventilator wet leaves is dewatered on a specific device that takes over half of the humidity. The next process can be done with two different methods - traditional and modern which are almost similar. In the traditional one, the produced leaves are rolled with chemistry-based enzymes in order t make a smooth loose tea. On the other technique which is more speedy and cut contemporary equipment, sheets are cut in a small quantity and curled in a particular form.
Regarding fermentation, which suits for both methods, the resulting mix is used for chemical reaction, where enzymes and air blended in order to change the color. Eventually, the black tea is heat in an oven or dried in a high-temperature mechanism which totally out the 97 percent of moisture. Finally, flavor and aroma are manufactured from natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Roman Gojayev | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12234042553 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90775281876 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670212765957 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.550634511 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138692107337 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521441850037 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416054018115 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886611358687 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01600439153 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.