Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Different factors play a role in the success of a person in whatever he is doing. Some say to have great achievements in sport, it is a must possess potential while others believe being diligent and persistent in doing exercises is more important than the body’s ability. This essay will analyze each view and based on the analysis, and in the final paragraph, the author will give his opinion.
For some, there is no doubt that in sport having the natural ability is important as it is in any other field to stand on the high ranks. They say our potentials may turn to something big if we work on them and make them active. However, if there is no potential at all, there is no chance to get something out of it no matter whatsoever we do. As an example, consider a person who wants to be the best in weight lifting but has thin and weak bones although has well-developed muscles. He will not be able to compete with somebody who has a body consists of big and strong bones and well-developed muscles. This simply shows that the potential has to be there.
Some refute the idea to be a champion in any sport you need to have the potential and they believe everybody has the potential and it is a matter of hard work and practice that decides who is the winner. Their example for this is Jiji Boof an Italian runner, who nobody sees any potential in him to be the champion of the Marathon. Nevertheless, he was exercising 10 hours every single day for five years and at the end, he won the competition. This shows that being diligent and persistent in exercises will finally pay the price.
To recapitulate, It has been discussed that having natural ability is the predominant factor to be a successful sportsperson for some while others focus more on hard work and practice. In my view, both ideas are partially true and I believe is their combination which leads to a big achievement in sport and none of them alone is enough.
Sorena Ashkani
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Sorena Eshkoor | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Sorena Eshkoor | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter:Explain the problem explain why they are so importanttell the man 73
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who can go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:Explain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead o 56
- You have received a letter about winning a prize in a competition organised by the media house, but didn’t receive that prize. Write a letter to the editor of a newspaper about it and say– Describe the competition and prize in details.– How do you f 73
- You recently broke your leg and your colleagues from work sent you get well cards and presents Write a letter to them and say Thank them for supporting you Describe how you spend your time Explain about your recovery process 43
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time.Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:Say which edition and when did the article appearExplain why you lost contact with your fr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: best
..., consider a person who wants to be the best in weight lifting but has thin and weak bones alt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, no doubt, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.5418719212 237% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 354.0 242.827586207 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56497175141 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63424705692 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4843724823 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261939060573 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759261076933 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896753340995 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176775996875 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859013964347 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.5310837438 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 68.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.