The charts below show one government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in same years.
The tables illustrate the numerial of focusing of government’s putting efforts In the culture and education field from 1995 and 2005, the total of participated in Arts events in the same years. From 1995, it is clear that the governments pay attention of literature while the people are quite low joining literature events. Since 2005, the authority has changes to make a balanced portion of literature and music.
Started by 1995, the literature are main focus of the state which had been spending a half from the total proportional. In addition, visual arts became the second concern to spread the culture and education. Moreover, theatre had third place which the portion a little bit low than visual arts. Furthermore, music is not big attention for the country which music is the lowest range from the total pie charts.
After one decades, the government made a balanced between literature and theatre which the rate was similar. However, music had a small rise to a quarter of stages. The number of visual arts was one-fourth dropped. From 1995 to 2005, the number participated of the events did not have significant transportation while visual arts around 50,000 or less, theatre 70,000 to 90,000 people, music approximately 120,000 to 150,000, and literature below 50,000.
In conclusion, the repsentative of country expected developing culture and education in four areas (visual arts, theatre, music, literature) which can be attract number of citizent joinning the programme. From those factors, the highest people interested is music which is government less focus it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | Jesslynindah | 42 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 to 2010. 84
- The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... Started by 1995, the literature are main focus of the state which had been spending a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tre had third place which the portion a little bit low than visual arts. Furthermore, musi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one decade', 'a decade', or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: one decade; a decade; decades
...e from the total pie charts. After one decades, the government made a balanced between...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, third, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29527559055 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81741537152 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7653579557 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272883466106 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931271152781 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102553345466 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164179534548 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097036669817 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.