The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2009.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2009.

The graph represents how many grams of the three spreads (butter, margarine, low-fat and reduced spread) were sold from 1981 to 2009.

Overall, the grams of butter and margarine declined gradually, but low-fat and reduced spread had an upward trend. In 1981, most people bought butter, but in 1991 to 2001 margarine spread became more popular. After 2001, low-fat and reduced spread became the highest selling spread.

In 1981, the gram of butter almost 140, it top grams is almost 160 in 1986, after that it declined sharply. The grams of margarine almost 90 in 1981, it reduced to 80 grams first and then went up to 100 in 1991. Until 2001, it was the highest selling spread. In 1996 the grams of low-fat and reduced spreads started from almost 10 and then it decreased dramatically. It has same grams with the margarine spread. Moreover, they were the highest selling spread in 2001.

Although after 2001, the grams of low-fat and reduced spread went down gradually, it still was the highest selling spread from 2001 to 2009.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-27 LauraTing 78 view
2024-09-07 dorae 67 view
2024-09-06 bassmodulators123 67 view
2024-08-31 bassmodulators123 78 view
2024-08-30 phadode 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tops'?
Suggestion: tops
...1981, the gram of butter almost 140, it top grams is almost 160 in 1986, after that...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88700564972 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21173272043 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6671741296 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6363636364 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223238119508 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109917565018 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08795814409 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193239595284 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101144587154 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.21 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.