The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals the percentage of waste being recycled from 1960 to 2011 percentages and the amount of waste recovery in tons.
It can be seen from the graph that the percentage of recycling remained relatively steady between 1960 and 1970. This figure rose gently over the next 15 years to 10.1% in 1985.
On the other hand, the amount of garbage tripled in the same period, from 5.6 million tons in 1970 to 16.7 million tons in 1985. Following this significant increase, the amount of waste material being recycled grew steadily between 1985 and 2011 when it peaked at 86.9 million tons.
Similarly, the recycling rate continued to grow sharply from 1985 to 1995, and then at a slower rate over the next 15 years until it reached the peak of 34.7% in 2011. However, this figure is still disappointing compared to the amount of waste being recycled each year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Harrykaur | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-06 | jaspreets817@gmail.com | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-12 | wtf7420 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 45
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
The line graph reveals the percentage of waste being recycled from 1960 to 2011 percentages and the amount of waste recovery in tons.
The line graph reveals the percentage of waste being recycled from 1960 to 2011 and the amount of waste recovery in tons.
flaws:
No. of Words: 152 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Characters: 698 1000
No. of Different Words: 83 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.511 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.592 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.301 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 42 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.848 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.492 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.765 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4